BM提议建立中英两大社区。我提议朱迪当中文区负责人！

首先BM会自己掏钱先养一个开发团队

然后把框架弄好之后建立中英两大社区

英文社区bm可能自己当负责人

中文社区说要找一个人

以后所有事两个负责人要沟通决定

包括资金分配 引入开发者等等

中文社区我提议朱迪

大家觉得呢？

以下是文章：

在我之前的帖子中 5我介绍了一个关于创建分散的社区治理系统的建议。本帖将进一步阐述这些想法，并纳入EOS社区的反馈。

首先，区分现有的EOS社区和这个新的EOS治理社区将有所帮助。EOS社区是EOS治理社区的超集。治理社区的当前代号是伊甸园操作系统（EOS）。伊甸园是一个通过智能合同自动化的过程，用于识别谁是社区成员以及分配多少预算。

语言和时区屏障

任何社区的最大挑战之一是促进沟通。由于缺乏清晰的沟通，两组人很容易相互不信任。更广泛的EOS社区由西方的核心开发人员和东方（中国）的大多数用户组成。还有一些重要但较小的社区讲西班牙语。

我书中的原则之一“更平等的动物——真正民主的微妙艺术” 1，即民主国家应按地理分组，以支持更大的地方自治，并防止因无法有效组织分裂运动而造成的暴政。如果每个县（约3000）选出一名代表，而国家是县的民主国家，而不是3亿人口的民主国家，那么美国人民将拥有更大的权力和代表性。民主民主的方法保护部分的独立性，并赋予人民权力。

因此，我建议将EOS建立为民主国家。在这种情况下，将有两个独立的社区，每个社区被分配到预算的50％。这就像给美国每个州平等分享创造的新美元。其结果是民主分享经济权力。

中国人民的需求和愿望可能不同于说英语的人的需求和愿望，但我们可以共存，而不必担心对方的内部政治。每当需要做出影响整个区块链的决定（如硬分叉和系统合同升级）时，两个社区的领导人都必须达成共识。只有领导人需要担心与其他社区谈判。

此外，当地英语和汉语社区成员将能够更好地追究当地领导人的责任。

伊甸园合同

伊甸园合同将允许任何人建立自己的社区。我会建立一个社区，我会与华人社区合作，确定一个人来建立一个华人社区。一旦这些社区达到1000名成员的门槛，并完成了第一次选举，那么EOS区块生产商就可以投票决定为每个社区分配0.125％的通货膨胀。

来自其他国家说其他语言的人可以自由地建立自己的社区。当这些社区的规模与英语和汉语相似时，英语和汉语可以投票将这些社区带入更广泛的EOS社区。

成为会员

要成为会员，您必须获得3名现有会员的邀请和批准，支付大约3小时最低工资（目前约为10个EOS）的会员资格，并由5名随机选出的官员之一进行审查。

这是一个“高”门槛，这是好事。作为会员，您将获得许多经济实力，并有望在履行帮助管理区块链的职责的同时，参与与其他成员的实时视频聊天。如果你找不到时间赚取所需的3小时最低工资，那么你将如何时间参与治理？

更广泛的EOS社区没有参与治理，将受益于放弃治理，并允许那些更致力于为社区建设提供资金的人确定方向。

有人担心民选官员有太多的工作来“审查”被邀请的人。我认为这不是个问题，因为假设最高增长（每人每年邀请20人），这意味着当选职位每周最多必须批准4人。考虑到预算示例，这意味着每次验证至少支付60美元，每次验证只需10分钟。由于增长率可能大大降低，这些人不会负担过重，并将得到丰厚的补偿。

驱逐一名成员

如果发现社区成员违反了社区行为守则，那么他们应该被删除。要解除某人的罪名必须由被指控违反行为守则的个人支付保证金。在不驱逐的情况下，这种保证金需要支付审判费用，并应劝阻虚假指控。

在提出指控并发布保证金后，5名随机选出的官员被召集审查此案。这可能涉及安排缩放通话，并给双方一个自我辩护的机会。如果5人中的3人同意驱逐，那么提出指控的人将获得双倍的保证金。此时，可以对邀请/认可被驱逐成员的各方展开调查。如果发现他们邀请袜子木偶，那么可能会提出新的指控，这个过程将继续。

有人担心罢选过程可能会淹没民选官员。我认为这不太可能，因为一开始就对成为会员有严格的要求。

伊甸园的筹资发展

我将亲自为伊甸园MVP的发展提供资金，聘请一个小组，如果社区采纳民选官员向我报销费用。这将在荣誉制度上完成，这意味着社区可以选举选择不补偿我的人。

由于我提议将伊甸园分为英语和汉语社区，因此我不可能同时参与其中。我会像其他人一样参与，如果我赢了，那意味着补偿我的共识。

引导社区

当社区首次创建时，创始人将完全控制邀请和驱逐成员，直到创始人决定举行第一次选举。这意味着社区可以在不开销的情况下获得一些初始牵引力，并且可以在链条上正式化之前开始组织离链。

发展路线图

在接下来的几周里，我将发布伊甸园智能合同的最新设计文件和规格。我的大部分开发团队将在4月15日左右开始。与此同时，我将寻找具有智能合同构建接口经验的社区成员，也许与Anchor团队合作，将治理流程集成到他们的钱包中。

Clarion最终将成为促进伊甸园治理讨论和社区建设的分散式通信平台。

In my prior post 6 I introduced a proposal for creating a decentralized community governance system. This post will expand upon those ideas further and incorporate feedback from the EOS community.

To begin with it will be helpful to make a distinction between the existing EOS community and this new EOS governance community. The EOS community is a superset of the EOS governance community. The current code-name for the governance community is Eden Operating System (EOS). Eden is a process automated by smart contracts for identifying who is a member of a community and how much budget they are allocated.

The Language and Time Zone Barrier

One of the biggest challenges of any community is facilitating communication. Absent clear communication it is easy for two groups of people to distrust one another. The broader EOS community is composed of core developers in the West and a majority of users in the East (China). There are also important, but smaller, communities that speak Spanish.

One of the principles from my book, “More Equal Animals - The subtle art of true democracy” 1, is that democracies should be grouped geographically to support greater local autonomy and protect against tyranny created by the inability to effectively organize a secession movement. The people of the United States would have more power and representation if every county (~3000) elected one representative and the country acted as a democracy of counties instead of a democracy of 300 million people. The democracy of democracies approach protects the independence of the parts and empowers the people.

I therefore propose that EOS be set up as a democracy of democracies. In this case, there would be two independent communities each of which is allocated 50％ of the budget. This would be like giving each state in the united states an equal share of the new dollars that are created. The result it democratic sharing of economic power.

The needs and wants of the Chinese people might be different than the needs and wants of the English speaking people, but we can coexist without worrying about the internal politics of the other side. Any time a decision needs to be made that impacts the entire blockchain (such as hard forks and system contract upgrades) then the leaders of the two communities would have to reach unanimous agreement. It is only the leaders that would need to worry about negotiating with the other community.

Furthermore, the local English and Chinese community members would be in a better position to hold their local leaders accountable.

Eden Contract

The Eden contract would allow anyone to start their own community. I would start one community and I would work with the Chinese community to identify someone to start a Chinese community. Once these communities reach a threshold of 1000 members and have completed their first election, then the EOS block producers could vote on allocating 0.125％ inflation to each community.

People from other countries speaking other languages would be free to start their own communities. When those communities reach a similar size to the English and Chinese then the English and Chinese can vote to bring those communities into the broader EOS community.

Becoming a Member

To become a member you must have an invitation and approval of 3 existing members, pay a membership due of approximately 3 hours of minimum wage (currently about 10 EOS), and be vetted by one of 5 randomly selected elected officials.

This is a “high” threshold and that is a good thing. As a member you are being given a lot of economic power and are expected to participate in live video chats with other members while fulfilling your duty to help govern the blockchain. If you are unable to find the time to earn the 3 hours of minimum wage required then how will you have the time to participate in governance?

The broader EOS community, which is not participating in governance, would benefit from abstaining from governance and allowing those more committed to funding the building of the community to set the direction.

There was some concern about the elected officials having too much work to “vet” people being invited. I believe this is a non-issue because assuming maximum growth (each person inviting 20 people per year), this would mean that the elected positions would have to approve at most 4 people per week. Given the example budgets, this would mean they are paid at least ￥60 per validation and each validation would only take 10 minutes. Since the growth rate is likely to be substantially less, these people will not be over burdened and will be well compensated.

Evicting a Member

If a member of the community is found violating the community code of conduct then they should be removed. To remove someone a bond must be paid by the individual making the accusation of a breach of the code of conduct. This bond needs to cover the cost of the trial in the event no eviction is made and should dissuade false accusations.

After making an accusation and posting a bond, 5 randomly selected elected officials are called to review the case. This might involve scheduling a zoom call and giving both sides an opportunity to defend themselves. If 3 of the 5 agree to evict then the individual who made the accusation gets double their bond back. At this time an investigation may be launched into the parties who invited / endorsed the member being evicted. If they are found to be inviting sock puppets then new charges might be filed and the process would continue.

There was some concern that the evection process could swamp the elected officials. I think this is unlikely given the stringent requirements of becoming a member in the first place.

Funding Development of Eden

I will personally fund development of the Eden MVP by hiring a small team with the request that if adopted by the community that the elected officials reimburse me for the costs. This will be done on the honor system, which means that the community could elect people that choose not to reimburse me.

Since I am proposing that Eden be split into English and Chinese communities it will not be possible for me to be part of both. I will participate like everyone else and if I win then that would imply consensus to reimburse me.

Bootstrapping the Community

When a community is first created, the founder will have complete control over inviting and evicting members until the founder decides to hold the first election. This means that a community can get some initial traction without a lot of overhead and that it can start to organize off chain before being formalized on chain.

Development Roadmap

Over the course of the next couple of weeks I will be publishing updated design documents and specifications for the Eden smart contract. Most of my development team will start around April 15th. In the mean time I will be looking for community members with experience building interfaces for the smart contract, perhaps working with the Anchor team to integrate the governance process into their wallet.

Clarion will eventually become the decentralized communication platform that facilitates Eden governance discussions and community building.